| |
Chapter 5: The Chapter 5:
Playfulness of the Liturgy
Grave and
earnest people, who make the knowledge of truth their whole aim, see
moral problems in everything, and seek for a definite purpose
everywhere, tend to experience a peculiar difficulty where the liturgy
is concerned.1 They incline to regard it as being to a certain extent
aimless, as superfluous pageantry of a needlessly complicated and
artificial character. They are affronted by the scrupulously exact
instructions which the liturgy gives on correct procedure, on the right
direction in which to turn, on the pitch of the voice, and so on. What
is the use of it all? The essential part of Holy Mass--the action of
Sacrifice and the divine Banquet--could be so easily consummated. Why,
then, the need for the solemn institution of the priestly office? The
necessary consecration could be so simply accomplished in so few words,
and the sacraments so straight-forwardly administered--what is the
reason of all the prayers and ceremonies? The liturgy tends to strike
people of this turn of mind as--to use the words which are really most
appropriate--trifling and theatrical.
The question is a serious one. It does not occur to everyone, but in the
people whom it does affect it is a sign of the mental attitude which
concentrates on and pursues that which is essential. It appears to be
principally connected with the question of purpose.
That which we call purpose is, in the true sense of the word, the
distributive, organizing principle which subordinates actions or objects
to other actions or objects, so that the one is directed towards the
other, and one exists for the sake of the other. That which is
subordinate, the means, is only significant in so far as it is capable
of serving that which is superior, the end. The purpose does not infuse
a spiritual value into its medium; it uses it as a passage to something
else, a thoroughfare merely; aim and fulcrum alike reside in the former.
From this point of view, every instrument has to prove in the first
place whether, and in the second to what extent, it is fitted to
accomplish the purpose for which it is employed. This proof will
primarily be headed by the endeavor to eliminate from the instrument all
the non-essential, unimportant, and superfluous elements. It is a
scientific principle that an end should be attained with the minimum
expenditure of energy, time, and material. A certain restless energy, an
indifference to the cost involved, and accuracy in going to the point,
characterize the corresponding turn of mind.
A disposition like this is, on the whole, both appropriate and necessary
to life, giving it earnestness and fixity of purpose. It also takes
reality into consideration, to the extent of viewing everything from the
standpoint of purpose. Many pursuits and professions can be shown to
have their origin almost entirely in the idea of purpose. Yet no
phenomenon can be entirely, and many can be, to a minor degree only,
comprehended in this category. Or, to put it more plainly, that which
gives objects and events their right to existence, and justifies their
individuality, is in many cases not the sole, and in others not even the
primary reason for their usefulness. Are flowers and leaves useful? Of
course; they are the vital organs of plants. Yet because of this, they
are not tied down to any particular form, color, or smell. Then what,
upon the whole, is the use of the extravagance of shapes, colors and
scents, in Nature? To what purpose the multiplicity of species? Things
could be so much more simple. Nature could be entirely filled with
animate beings, and they could thrive and progress in a far quicker and
more suitable manner. The indiscriminate application to Nature of the
idea of purpose is, however, open to objection. To go to the root of the
matter, what is the object of this or that plant, and of this or that
animal, existing at all? Is it in order to afford nourishment to some
other plant or animal? Of course not. Measured merely by the standard of
apparent and external utility, there is a great deal in Nature which is
only partially, and nothing which is wholly and entirely, intended for a
purpose, or, better still, purposeful. Indeed, considered in this light,
a great deal is purposeless. In a mechanical structure--a machine, say,
or a bridge-everything has a purpose; and the same thing applies to
business enterprises or to the government of a State; yet even where
these phenomena are concerned, the idea of purpose is not far-reaching
enough to give an adequate reply to the query, whence springs their
right to existence?
If we want to do justice to the whole question, we must shift our angle
of vision. The conception of purpose regards an object's center of
gravity as existing outside that object, seeing it lie instead in the
transition to further movement, i.e., that towards the goal which the
object provides. But every object is to a certain extent, and many are
entirely, self-sufficient and an end in itself--if, that is, the
conception can be applied at all in this extensive sense. The conception
of meaning is more adaptable. Objects which have no purpose in the
strict sense of the term have a meaning. This meaning is not realized by
their extraneous effect or by the contribution which they make to the
stability or the modification of another object, but their significance
consists in being what they are. Measured by the strict sense of the
word, they are purposeless, but still full of meaning.
Purpose and meaning are the two aspects of the fact that an existent
principle possesses the motive for, and the right to, its own essence
and existence. An object regarded from the point of view of purpose is
seen to dovetail into an order of things which comprehends both it and
more beyond it; from the standpoint of meaning, it is seen to be based
upon itself.
Now what is the meaning of that which exists? That it should exist and
should be the image of God the Everlasting. And what is the meaning of
that which is alive? That it should live, bring forth its essence, and
bloom as a natural manifestation of the living God.
This is true of Nature. It is also true of the life of the soul. Has
science an aim or an object in the real sense of the word? No.
Pragmatism is trying to foist one upon it. It insists that the aim of
science is to better humanity and to improve it from the moral point of
view. Yet this constitutes a failure to appreciate the independent value
of knowledge. Knowledge has no aim, but it has a meaning, and one that
is rooted in itself--truth. The legislative activity of Parliament, for
instance, has an end in view; it is intended to bring about a certain
agreed result in the life of the State. Jurisprudence, on the contrary,
has no object; it merely indicates where truth lies in questions of law.
The same thing applies to all real science. According to its nature, it
is either the knowledge of truth or the service of truth, but nothing
else. Has art any aim or purpose? No, it has not. If it had, we should
be obliged to conclude that art exists in order to provide a living for
artists, or else, as the eighteenth century German thinkers of the "Aufklarung"--the
"age of enlightenment"--considered, it is intended to offer concrete
examples of intelligent views and to inculcate virtue. This is
absolutely untrue. The work of art has no purpose, but it has a
meaning--"ut sit"--that it should exist, and that it should clothe in
clear and genuine form the essence of things and the inner life of the
human artist. It is merely to be "splendor veritatis," the glory of
truth.
When life lacks the austere guidance of the sense of purpose it
degenerates into pseudo-aestheticism. But when it is forced into the
rigid framework that is the purely purposeful conception of the world,
it droops and perishes. The two conceptions are interdependent. Purpose
is the goal of all effort, labor and organization, meaning is the
essence of existence, of flourishing, ripening life. Purpose and
meaning, effort and growth, activity and production, organization and
creation--these are the two poles of existence.
The life of the Universal Church is also organized on these lines. In
the first place, there is the whole tremendous system of purposes
incorporated in the Canon Law, and in the constitution and government of
the Church. Here we find every means directed to the one end, that of
keeping in motion the great machinery of ecclesiastical government. The
first-mentioned point of view will decide whether adjustment or
modification best serves the collective purpose, and whether the latter
is attained with the least possible expenditure of time and energy.2 The
scheme of labor must be arranged and controlled by a strictly practical
spirit.
The Church, however, has another side. It embraces a sphere which is in
a special sense free from purpose. And that is the liturgy. The latter
certainly comprehends a whole system of aims and purposes, as well as
the instruments to accomplish them. It is the business of the Sacraments
to act as the channels of certain graces. This mediation, however, is
easily and quickly accomplished when the necessary conditions are
present. The administration of the Sacraments is an example of a
liturgical action which is strictly confined to the one object. Of
course, it can be said of the liturgy, as of every action and every
prayer which it contains, that it is directed towards the providing of
spiritual instruction. This is perfectly true. But the liturgy has no
thought-out, deliberate, detailed plan of instruction. In order to sense
the difference it is sufficient to compare a week of the ecclesiastical
year with the Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius. In the latter every
element is determined by deliberate choice, everything is directed
towards the production of a certain spiritual and didactic result; each
exercise, each prayer, even the way in which the hours of repose are
passed, all aim at the one thing, the conversion of the will. It is not
so with the liturgy. The fact that the latter has no place in the
Spiritual Exercises is a proof of this.3 The liturgy wishes to teach,
but not by means of an artificial system of aim-
conscious educational influences; it simply creates an entire spiritual
world in which the soul can live according to the requirements of its
nature. The difference resembles that which exists between a gymnasium,
in which every detail of the apparatus and every exercise aims at a
calculated effect, and the open woods and fields. In the first
everything is consciously directed towards discipline and development,
in the second life is lived with Nature, and internal growth takes place
in her. The liturgy creates a universe brimming with fruitful spiritual
life, and allows the soul to wander about in it at will and to develop
itself there. The abundance of prayers, ideas, and actions, and the
whole arrangement of the calendar are incomprehensible when they are
measured by the objective standard of strict suitability for a purpose.
The liturgy has no purpose, or, at least, it cannot be considered from
the standpoint of purpose. It is not a means which is adapted to attain
a certain end--it is an end in itself. This fact is important, because
if we overlook it, we labor to find all kinds of didactic purposes in
the liturgy which may certainly be stowed away somewhere, but are not
actually evident.
When the liturgy is rightly regarded, it cannot be said to have a
purpose, because it does not exist for the sake of humanity, but for the
sake of God. In the liturgy man is no longer concerned with himself; his
gaze is directed towards God. In it man is not so much intended to edify
himself as to contemplate God's majesty. The liturgy means that the soul
exists in God's presence, originates in Him, lives in a world of divine
realities, truths, mysteries and symbols, and really lives its true,
characteristic and fruitful life.4
There are two very profound passages in Holy Scripture, which are quite
decisive on the point. One is found in the description of Ezekiel's
vision.5 Let us consider the flaming Cherubim, who "every one of them
went straight forward, whither the impulse of the Spirit was to go . .
., and they turned not when they went . . ., ran and returned like
flashes of lightning . . ., went . . . and stood . . . and were lifted
up from the earth . . .. the noise of their wings was like the noise of
many waters . . ., and when they stood, their wings were let down." How
"aimless" they are! How discouraging for the zealous partisans of
reasonable suitability for a purpose! They are only pure motion,
powerful and splendid, acting according to the direction of the Spirit,
desiring nothing save to express Its inner drift and Its interior glow
and force. They are the living image of the liturgy.
In the second passage it is Eternal Wisdom which speaks: "I was with
Him, forming all things, and was delighted every day, playing before Him
at all times, playing in the world...."6
This is conclusive. It is the delight of the Eternal Father that Wisdom
(the Son, the perfect Fullness of Truth) should pour out Its eternal
essence before Him in all Its ineffable splendor, without any
"purpose"--for what purpose should It have?--but full of decisive
meaning, in pure and vocal happiness; the Son "plays" before the Father.
Such is the life of the highest beings, the angels, who, without a
purpose and as the Spirit stirs them, move before God, and are a mystic
diversion and a living song before Him.
In the earthly sphere there are two phenomena which tend in the same
direction: the play of the child and the creation of the artist.
The child, when it plays, does not aim at anything. It has no purpose.
It does not want to do anything but to exercise its youthful powers,
pour forth its life in an aimless series of movements, words and
actions, and by this to develop and to realize itself more fully; all of
which is purposeless, but full of meaning nevertheless, the significance
lying in the unchecked revelation of this youthful life in thoughts and
words and movements and actions, in the capture and expression of its
nature, and in the fact of its existence. And because it does not aim at
anything in particular, because it streams unbroken and spontaneously
forth, its utterance will be harmonious, its form clear and fine; its
expression will of itself become picture and dance, rhyme, melody and
song. That is what play means; it is life, pouring itself forth without
an aim, seizing upon riches from its own abundant store, significant
through the fact of its existence. It will be beautiful, too, if it is
left to itself, and if no futile advice and pedagogic attempts at
enlightenment foist upon it a host of aims and purposes, thus
denaturizing it.
Yet, as life progresses, conflicts ensue, and it appears to grow ugly
and discordant. Man sets before himself what he wants to do and what he
should do, and tries to realize this in his life. But in the course of
these endeavors he learns that many obstacles stand in his way, and he
perceives that it is very seldom that he can attain his ideal.
It is in a different order, in the imaginary sphere of representation,
that man tries to reconcile the contradiction between that which he
wishes to be and that which he is. In art he tries to harmonize the
ideal and actuality, that which he ought to be and that which he is, the
soul within and nature without, the body and the soul. Such are the
visions of art. It has no didactic aims, then; it is not intended to
inculcate certain truths and virtues. A true artist has never had such
an end in view. In art, he desires to do nothing but to overcome the
discord to which we have referred, and to express in the sphere of
representation the higher life of which he stands in need, and to which
in actuality he has only approximately attained. The artist merely wants
to give life to his being and its longings, to give external form to the
inner truth. And people who contemplate a work of art should not expect
anything of it but that they should be able to linger before it, moving
freely, becoming conscious of their own better nature, and sensing the
fulfillment of their most intimate longings. But they should not reason
and chop logic, or look for instruction and good advice from it.
The liturgy offers something higher. In it man, with the aid of grace,
is given the opportunity of realizing his fundamental essence, of really
becoming that which
according to his divine destiny he should be and longs to be, a child of
God. In the liturgy he is to go "unto God, Who giveth joy to his
youth."7 All this is, of course, on the supernatural plane, but at the
same time it corresponds to the same degree to the inner needs of man's
nature. Because the life of the liturgy is higher than that to which
customary reality gives both the opportunity and form of expression, it
adopts suitable forms and methods from that sphere in which alone they
are to be found, that is to say, from art. It speaks measuredly and
melodiously; it employs formal, rhythmic gestures; it is clothed in
colors and garments foreign to everyday life; it is carried out in
places and at hours which have been co-ordinated and systematized
according to sublimer laws than ours. It is in the highest sense the
life of a child, in which everything is picture, melody and song.
Such is the wonderful fact which the liturgy demonstrates; it unites art
and reality in a supernatural childhood before God. That which formerly
existed in the world of unreality only, ant was rendered in art as the
expression of mature human life, has here become reality. These forms
are the vital expression of real and frankly supernatural life. But this
has one thing in common with the play of the child and the life of
art--it has no purpose, but it is full of profound meaning. It is not
work, but play. To be at play, or to fashion a work of art in God's
sight--not to create, but to exist--such is the essence of the liturgy.
From this is derived its sublime mingling of profound earnestness and
divine joyfulness. The fact that the liturgy gives a thousand strict and
careful directions on the quality of the language, gestures, colors,
garments and instruments which it employs, can only be understood by
those who are able to take art and play seriously. Have you ever noticed
how gravely children draw up the rules of their games, on the form of
the melody, the position of the hands, the meaning of this stick and
that tree? It is for the sake of the silly people who may not grasp
their meaning and who will persist in seeing the justification of an
action or object only in its obvious purpose. Have you ever read of or
even experienced the deadly earnestness with which the artist-
vassal labors for art, his lord? Of his sufferings on the score of
language? Or of what an overweening mistress form is? And all this for
something that has no aim or purpose! No, art does not bother about
aims. Does anyone honestly believe that the artist would take upon
himself the thousand anxieties and feverish perplexities incident to
creation if he intended to do nothing with his work but to teach the
spectator a lesson, which he could just as well express in a couple of
facile phrases, or one or two historical examples, or a few well-taken
photographs? The only answer to this can be an emphatic negative. Being
an artist means wrestling with the expression of the hidden life of man,
avowedly in order that it may be given existence; nothing more. It is
the image of the Divine creation, of which it is said that it has made
things "ut sint."
The liturgy does the same thing. It too, with endless care, with all the
seriousness of the child and the strict conscientiousness of the great
artist, has toiled to express in a thousand forms the sacred, God-given
life of the soul to no other purpose than that the soul may therein have
its existence and live its life. The liturgy has laid down the serious
rules of the sacred game which the soul plays before God. And, if we are
desirous of touching bottom in this mystery, it is the Spirit of fire
and of holy discipline "Who has knowledge of the world"8--the Holy
Ghost-Who has ordained the game which the Eternal Wisdom plays before
the Heavenly Father in the Church, Its kingdom on earth. And "Its
delight" is in this way" to be with the children of men."
Only those who are not scandalized by this understand what the liturgy
means. From the very first every type of rationalism has turned against
it. The practice of the liturgy means that by the help of grace, under
the guidance of the Church, we grow into living works of art before God,
with no other aim or purpose than that of living and existing in His
sight; it means fulfilling God's Word and "becoming as little children";
it means foregoing maturity with all its purposefulness, and confining
oneself to play, as David did when he danced before the Ark. It may, of
course, happen that those extremely clever people, who merely from being
grown-up have lost all spiritual youth and spontaneity, will
misunderstand this and jibe at it. David probably had to face the
derision of Michal.
It is in this very aspect of the liturgy that its didactic aim is to be
found, that of teaching the soul not to see purposes everywhere, not to
be too conscious of the end it wishes to attain, not to be desirous of
being over-clever and grown-up, but to understand simplicity in life.
The soul must learn to abandon, at least in prayer, the restlessness of
purposeful activity; it must learn to waste time for the sake of God,
and to be prepared for the sacred game with sayings and thoughts and
gestures, without always immediately asking "why?" and "wherefore?" It
must learn not to be continually yearning to do something, to attack
something, to accomplish something useful, but to play the divinely
ordained game of the liturgy in liberty and beauty and holy joy before
God.
In the end, eternal life will be its fulfillment. Will the people who do
not understand the liturgy be pleased to find that the heavenly
consummation is an eternal song of praise? Will they not rather
associate themselves with those other industrious people who consider
that such an eternity will be both boring and unprofitable?
ENDNOTES
1. In what follows the writer must beg the reader not to weigh isolated
words and phrases. The matter under consideration is vague and
intangible, and not easy to put into words. The writer can only be sure
of not being misunderstood if the reader considers the chapter and the
general train of thought as a whole.
2. Even when the Church is considered from its other aspect, that of a
Divine work of art. Yet the former conception is bound to recur in this
connection.
3. The Benedictines give it one, but do so in an obviously different
system of spiritual exercises to that conceived by St. Ignatius.
4. The fact that the liturgy moralizes so little is consistent with this
conception. In the liturgy the soul forms itself, not by means of
deliberate teaching and the exercise of virtue, but by the fact that it
exists in the light of eternal Truth, and is naturally and
supernaturally robust.
5. Ezekiel i. 4 et seq., especially 12, 17, 20, 24, and x. 9 et seq.
6. Proverbs viii. 30, 31.
7. Entrance prayer of the Mass.
8. Responsory at Terce, Pentecost.
|
|